Ariana Grande publicly criticized the White House after it used her 2024 song "Bye" in a TikTok video promoting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrests. The singer posted a comment on the platform stating, 'Please do not ever use my music in relation to this barbaric, inhumane, heinous nonsense. F—k ICE.' The White House later removed the sound from the video. In response, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson defended the ICE actions, stating, 'What’s actually barbaric, inhumane, and heinous are the criminal illegal aliens who have injured and murdered innocent American citizens.' Grande’s comment was initially visible but later became inaccessible, according to her spokesperson. The incident follows a pattern of artists, including Beyoncé and Celine Dion, objecting to the Trump administration using their music without authorization. Grande has previously expressed opposition to the administration’s immigration policies, including sharing an Instagram post critical of its treatment of immigrants and attending the Women’s March in 2017.
Politics
Ariana Grande demands White House stop using her song in ICE video
By The Unbiased Times AI
June 12, 2026 • 2:43 AM• Updated June 12, 2026 • 3:45 AM
Bias Check:
80% bias removed from 3 sources
/ 3
80%
Narrative Analysis
How different sources frame this story
Celebrity opposition to ICE enforcement
Sources: dailymail.co.uk · latimes.com
Focus
The ethical and legal concerns raised by Ariana Grande and other artists over the use of their music in government propaganda.
Evidence Subset
Grande’s direct comment on TikTok, the removal of her song from the video, and comparisons to other artists’ objections.
Silhouette (Omissions)
The White House’s defense of ICE actions and the broader political context of immigration enforcement.
White House defense of ICE actions
Sources: foxnews.com
Focus
The administration’s justification for using Grande’s music and its criticism of her stance as elitist.
Evidence Subset
The White House’s statement linking illegal immigration to violent crimes and its framing of Grande’s comment as an attack on law enforcement.
Silhouette (Omissions)
The artists’ perspectives and the historical context of unauthorized music use by the administration.
Cross-Narrative Analysis
How the narratives compare
Narrative A emphasizes the ethical and legal concerns of artists, while Narrative B focuses on the White House’s defense of ICE actions and its criticism of celebrity opposition. A reader of only one narrative would miss the opposing perspective, either the artists’ objections or the administration’s justification.
This analysis identifies how media sources emphasize different aspects of the same story. No narrative is labeled as more accurate than others.
Share this article
Source Material
via dailymail.co.uk
High Bias
via latimes.com
High Bias