President Donald Trump has revealed that he left instructions for a massive retaliatory bombing campaign against Iran in the event of his assassination. The disclosure comes as Israel reportedly shared intelligence with the U.S. about a new Iranian plot to kill Trump, according to multiple sources. Trump told the New York Post that he had left orders for the U.S. to retaliate with unprecedented force if Iran succeeds in assassinating him. 'I’ve left instructions, if anything happens, to just literally bomb them at levels that they’ve never seen before,' Trump said. The claims follow reports that Israel shared intelligence with the U.S. about a specific Iranian assassination plot targeting Trump. Trump dismissed the idea of a newly surfaced threat, emphasizing that Iran has long targeted him. 'No, no. Israel came up with nothing. No, no,' Trump said. 'I've been number one for a long time, and it's the way life is, you know.' The intelligence comes amid heightened tensions between the U.S. and Iran, with both sides trading strikes in recent days. Iranian crowds have also called for Trump's death during the funeral of former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Experts have noted that a president cannot legally leave instructions for military action after death, as all authority would transfer to the successor. Meanwhile, the U.S. has halted attacks on Iran in hopes of easing tensions, though officials say the military remains ready to resume fighting if necessary.
Global Affairs
Israel Warns US of New Iranian Plot to Assassinate Trump
By The Unbiased Times AI
July 10, 2026 • 4:26 PM• Updated July 10, 2026 • 6:52 PM
Bias Check:
72% bias removed from 10 sources
/ 10
72%
Narrative Analysis
How different sources frame this story
Imminent Threat and Retaliatory Posture
Sources: jpost.com · dailymail.co.uk · washingtonpost.com · torontosun.com · channelnewsasia.com · timesofindia.indiatimes.com · independent.co.uk
Focus
The immediate threat to Trump's life and the U.S.'s retaliatory stance, emphasizing the severity of the Iranian plot and Trump's preemptive military instructions.
Evidence Subset
Reports of Israel sharing intelligence on a specific Iranian assassination plot, Trump's statements about leaving retaliatory orders, and the historical context of Iranian threats against him.
Silhouette (Omissions)
The narrative downplays the legal and procedural limitations of Trump's ability to leave binding military instructions post-death, as well as the broader geopolitical context of U.S.-Iran relations.
Diplomatic and Strategic Restraint
Sources: csmonitor.com · washingtonpost.com · jpost.com
Focus
The ongoing diplomatic efforts between the U.S. and Iran, despite recent escalations, and the strategic reasons behind Iran's restraint in carrying out attacks on U.S. soil.
Evidence Subset
Reports of the U.S. halting attacks on Iran to ease tensions, the absence of materialized Iranian attacks on U.S. soil despite threats, and analysts' views on Iran's political pragmatism.
Silhouette (Omissions)
This narrative minimizes the immediate threat to Trump's life and the specific details of the alleged assassination plot, focusing instead on broader strategic considerations.
Legal and Constitutional Concerns
Sources: jpost.com · washingtonpost.com · washingtonpost.com
Focus
The legal and constitutional implications of Trump's claims to leave instructions for military action after his death, highlighting the transfer of authority to his successor.
Evidence Subset
Expert opinions on the inability of a president to bind future administrations to military actions, and the constitutional framework governing presidential authority.
Silhouette (Omissions)
This narrative omits the immediate operational details of the alleged assassination plot and the geopolitical context of U.S.-Iran relations, focusing solely on the legal aspects.
Cross-Narrative Analysis
How the narratives compare
The most significant differences between the narratives lie in their prioritization of immediate threats versus long-term strategic considerations. Narrative A emphasizes the urgency of the assassination plot and the U.S.'s retaliatory posture, while Narrative B focuses on the broader diplomatic efforts and Iran's strategic restraint. Narrative C diverges by centering on the legal and constitutional limitations of Trump's claims. A reader of only one narrative would miss critical perspectives: those focused on Narrative A might overlook the diplomatic efforts and legal constraints, while those focused on Narrative B might underestimate the immediate threat to Trump's life.
This analysis identifies how media sources emphasize different aspects of the same story. No narrative is labeled as more accurate than others.
Share this article
Want the next story without checking back? Join our Telegram channel for fresh articles and breaking updates.
Join the Telegram channelSource Material
via washingtonexaminer.com
High Bias
via csmonitor.com
High Bias
via torontosun.com
High Bias
via channelnewsasia.com
High Bias
via timesofindia.indiatimes.com
High Bias
via independent.co.uk
High Bias
via washingtonexaminer.com
High Bias
via jpost.com
High Bias