A New York judge has granted anonymity protections to a former Cornell University student, identified as Jane Doe, who is pursuing a civil lawsuit alleging sexual assault by seven fraternity members. The decision comes as the legal proceedings advance while Jane Doe faces ongoing threats and harassment.
Judge orders anonymity and warns against threats
Judge Phaedra Perry-Bond of the New York State Supreme Court ruled on Friday that Jane Doe may proceed with her civil lawsuit under a pseudonym, citing the highly publicized nature of the allegations and concerns about retaliation. The judge emphasized the widespread reports of threats and cyberstalking targeting Jane Doe, her family, and others connected to the case. In her written opinion, Perry-Bond stated that such behavior could constitute federal crimes, including cyberstalking and interstate threats.
The ruling requires all court filings to conceal Jane Doe’s identity and other sensitive details. Perry-Bond also suggested extending anonymity protections to the defendants, encouraging them to seek similar privacy measures. The decision does not address the merits of the allegations but establishes procedural safeguards for all parties involved.
Allegations and legal responses
Jane Doe’s lawsuit, filed in civil court, alleges she was drugged and gang-raped at the Chi Phi fraternity house in October 2024. The seven men named as defendants have denied the allegations, and no criminal charges have been filed. Jane Doe’s attorney, Thomas Giuffra, has stated that she and her family have faced doxxing, harassment, and threats since the lawsuit was made public.
Cornell University has stated it fully supports the appointment of a special prosecutor and is conducting an internal investigation into its response to the allegations. New York Attorney General Letitia James, appointed by Gov. Kathy Hochul, is also conducting a separate investigation into the incident. The case has drawn significant attention to how universities handle sexual assault claims.
Ongoing threats and legal protections
The judge’s ruling includes a warning to the public, noting that anyone who engages in cyberstalking, harassment, or threats against Jane Doe, the defendants, or their attorneys could face criminal prosecution. Perry-Bond’s decision follows reports of malicious actors attempting to identify Jane Doe and using her alleged identity to harass others connected to the case. The court’s order aims to mitigate further harm while the civil lawsuit proceeds.