A judge has ruled that the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors unlawfully took control of key election functions from the county recorder, a decision that could impact voting in Arizona's upcoming midterm elections. The ruling clarifies the division of responsibilities between the recorder's office and the board.
Core Facts
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Scott Blaney ruled that the board of supervisors acted unlawfully by seizing personnel, systems, and equipment from the recorder's office. The judge determined that the recorder's office is responsible for overseeing in-person early voting, while the board handles other operations like selecting Election Day voting locations and hiring poll workers.
Background and Context
The legal battle stems from a dispute between Republican Recorder Justin Heap and the predominantly Republican county board. Heap sued the board last summer, alleging it had illegally transferred funding, IT staff, and key functions—including management of ballot drop boxes and early voting sites—from his office. The agreement in question was negotiated with Heap's predecessor, whom he defeated in a GOP primary.
Implications
The ruling could have significant implications for Arizona, a battleground state with several high-profile races this fall. Maricopa County, which includes Phoenix, has been a focal point for election conspiracy theories since President Donald Trump lost the state to Democrat Joe Biden in 2020.
Reactions
Board Chairwoman Kate Brophy McGee indicated the board would comply with the ruling but did not provide further comment. Heap's office has not yet issued a public statement on the decision.
Legal and Procedural Details
Judge Blaney's ruling states that the board's assertion of plenary authority over election administration is inconsistent with Arizona law. The decision clarifies the statutory authority of both the recorder's office and the board, ensuring a clearer division of responsibilities moving forward.