A retired pastor in the United Kingdom is awaiting a ruling after standing trial on criminal charges related to a sermon he preached near a hospital. Clive Johnston, 77, faces two charges stemming from a July 7, 2024, sermon on John 3:16 delivered near Causeway Hospital in Coleraine. Prosecutors allege he violated Northern Ireland’s Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) Act 2023 by preaching in a protected zone near a facility where abortions are performed. If convicted, he could face a criminal record and a fine of up to £2,500 ($3,376). The Christian Institute, which is supporting his legal case, claims Johnston may be the first person prosecuted under the law for preaching a sermon unrelated to abortion in a protected zone. A District Judge reserved judgment until May 7, 2026, following a hearing at Coleraine Magistrates’ Court on April 22, 2026. A newly released police bodycam video of the July 2024 incident shows an officer informing Johnston he was in a clearly marked safe access zone and could not film or preach in the area. The officer stated that while preaching the word of God may be well-intentioned, it could be considered reckless if it affected patients, staff, or protected individuals. Johnston responded by questioning whether the word of God, historically proclaimed freely, could now be considered offensive outside a hospital. The officer suggested Johnston could provide religious guidance inside the hospital’s chaplaincy area instead.
Crime
UK Pastor Awaits Ruling on Charges for Preaching Near Hospital
By The Unbiased Times AI
April 26, 2026 • 5:36 AM• Updated April 26, 2026 • 6:29 AM
Bias Check:
42% bias removed from 2 sources
/ 2
42%
Narrative Analysis
How different sources frame this story
Free Speech and Religious Freedom Under Threat
Sources: foxnews.com
Focus
The potential infringement on religious freedom and free speech in the UK, framing the prosecution as an overreach of government power.
Evidence Subset
The pastor’s argument that preaching the word of God, historically free, is now restricted; the Christian Institute’s support for his case.
Silhouette (Omissions)
The legal rationale for the safe access zones and the potential impact on patients and staff.
Enforcement of Abortion Access Laws
Sources: yahoo.com
Focus
The enforcement of laws designed to protect abortion access and the legal process surrounding the case.
Evidence Subset
The charges against Johnston, the police officer’s explanation of the safe access zone laws, and the potential consequences of a conviction.
Silhouette (Omissions)
The broader debate on free speech and religious freedom, focusing instead on the legal and procedural aspects.
Cross-Narrative Analysis
How the narratives compare
The most significant difference between the narratives is the prioritization of either free speech and religious freedom (Narrative A) or the enforcement of abortion access laws (Narrative B). A reader of only one silo would miss the counterarguments presented in the other, leading to a skewed understanding of the case’s implications.
This analysis identifies how media sources emphasize different aspects of the same story. No narrative is labeled as more accurate than others.
Share this article