Former FBI Director James Comey was indicted last week on charges alleging he threatened the life of President Donald Trump after posting a photo on Instagram of seashells forming the numbers “86 47.” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche stated on Sunday that the indictment goes beyond the controversial Instagram post, citing a body of evidence collected over 11 months. Blanche emphasized that the case involves more than just the seashell photo, though he declined to disclose specific details, promising transparency during the public trial.
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) questioned the legal basis of the indictment, arguing that the term “86” has roots in the restaurant industry and is not inherently violent. Tillis, who worked in the restaurant industry, stated that “86” historically meant removing an item from a menu or refusing service, not inciting violence. He also expressed skepticism about the case’s foundation, comparing it to previous investigations he deemed unfounded.
President Trump, when asked about the post, suggested that “86” is a mob term for murder. However, restaurant workers interviewed by NBC News described the term as everyday lingo unrelated to violence. The phrase “86 47” has appeared frequently on social media and online shops, though its exact meaning remains debated.
Blanche reiterated that the Justice Department has collected extensive evidence beyond the Instagram post, though he did not specify what that evidence entails. The case has sparked debate over the interpretation of the term “86” and whether it constitutes a credible threat.