Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D-MA) has publicly criticized Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner over his past Nazi-linked tattoo, calling it "personally disqualifying." The controversy has sparked a debate within the Democratic Party about whether Platner should remain the nominee in the race against incumbent Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME).
Core Facts
Auchincloss, a Jewish lawmaker, told CNN on Monday that Platner’s tattoo—originally resembling a Nazi SS ‘Totenkopf’ symbol—was a disqualifying factor. He also criticized Platner’s past comments about the tattoo, which Platner has claimed he did not understand the significance of when he got it in 2007. Auchincloss denied supporting Collins, stating he opposes her policies but believes Platner is not the right candidate for Democrats.
Context and Reactions
Platner, a former Marine and Army veteran, has faced scrutiny since the tattoo’s discovery. He has since covered it up and claimed he was unaware of its Nazi associations. However, reports suggest he knew the symbol’s meaning, which has fueled criticism. Auchincloss is among the few Democrats to publicly oppose Platner, while others argue that opposing him effectively aids Collins’ reelection.
Intraparty Divisions
Some Democrats, including political strategist Saikat Chakrabarti, have accused Auchincloss of indirectly endorsing Collins by opposing Platner. Chakrabarti called for Auchincloss to be primaried, arguing that a Republican-controlled Senate is unacceptable. Meanwhile, Collins’ campaign has seized on the controversy, framing it as evidence of Democratic infighting.
Broader Implications
The dispute highlights tensions within the Democratic Party over candidate vetting and the balance between ideological purity and electability. Platner’s campaign has tried to pivot to economic issues, including a recent ad targeting private equity firms, but the tattoo controversy continues to dominate the narrative.